Back to projects
ResumeGitHubLinkedIn

Atharva Bhorpe · Project

Cost-effective AMR — RBot

A student-built ROS platform intended for low-cost robotics education and research.

Role
Integrating the ROS stack with Arduino firmware on ESP32
Tools
ROS · Arduino · ESP32 · Fusion 360
RBot initial prototype, rocker mechanism and final prototype from the supplied design portfolio
Project photographs extracted from the supplied design portfolio.

Problem and objective

Many mobile robots use expensive or proprietary hardware and software. RBot was designed as an affordable, modifiable platform for education, research and development.

This final-year college project involved five students: three from electronics and two from mechanical engineering. The supplied design portfolio describes LiDAR, tracking and depth cameras, and an IMU for SLAM and autonomous navigation.

My contribution and approach

I integrated the ROS stack with the robot firmware, written with Arduino on an ESP32.

The team designed the robot in Fusion 360. Its chassis uses 20×20mm aluminium profiles, and its casing uses waterproof MDF board. The design allows changes to the electronics and actuator selection.

RBot hardware architecture: tracking camera and LiDAR feed a laptop; IMU and encoder feed ESP32; motor driver, relays and kill switches connect the control and power systems
Hardware architecture from the supplied design portfolio. The author confirms that the final robot used a laptop.

Reported results and limitations

The team timed the robot over a dedicated 10-metre test track with varied payloads. The recorded travel times were used to estimate speed.

Source graph of robot speed versus payload, with payload from 5 to 15kg and speed decreasing as payload increases
Original performance figure from the supplied PDF. No numerical values have been inferred from the graph.

The PDF reports a prototype and a performance test, not a production deployment. These tests have not been independently reproduced for this portfolio.

The author confirms that the final laptop-based robot carried 5kg at 0.3m/s. This is an author-reported measurement, not an independent reproduction. The 10-metre track remains the documented test method; no additional timing or budget values are inferred.

Source record

This case study uses the project text and figures in the two-page design portfolio supplied by the author. Only the project figures are included here; the source PDF is not published.

Sources and evidence

Source: author-supplied design portfolio, project text and figures. The source PDF is not a public download. No public code or raw test data was supplied.

← Back to projects